« Safety | Responsible Use | Table of Contents »
Responsible Use
An appropriate
place to conclude this summary is an example of responsible use guidelines such
as those of the U.S. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
(NORML):
Principles of Responsible Cannabis Use
- Cannabis consumption is for adults
only. Many things and activities are suitable for young people, but others
absolutely are not. Children do not drive cars, enter into contracts or
marry, and they must not use drugs.
- The responsible cannabis user does
not operate a motor vehicle or other dangerous machinery impaired by
cannabis. Although cannabis is said by most experts to be safer than
alcohol and many prescription drugs with motorists, public safety demands
that impaired drivers be taken off the road and that objective measures of
impairment be developed and used, rather than chemical testing.
- The responsible cannabis user will
carefully consider his/her setting and regulate use accordingly. The
responsible cannabis consumer will be vigilant as to conditions -- time,
place, mood, etc. -- and does not hesitate to say "no" when
those conditions are not conducive to a safe, pleasant and/or productive
experience.
- Use of cannabis, to the extent that
it impairs health, personal development or achievement, is abuse and
should be resisted by responsible cannabis users. Abuse means harm. Some
cannabis use is harmful; most is not. That which is harmful should be
discouraged; that which is not need not be.
- The responsible cannabis user does
not violate the rights of others, observes accepted standards of courtesy
and public propriety, and respects the preferences of those who wish to
avoid cannabis entirely. Regardless of the legal status of cannabis,
responsible users will adhere to emerging tobacco smoking protocols in
public and private places.
It must be
remembered however that while NORML has envisioned their guidelines from a harm
reduction perspective, this is only their interpretation of responsible
cannabis use and different perspectives do exist. For example, many people
begin experimenting with cannabis well before they are legally adults. In fact,
according to Statistics Canada, the highest rate of cannabis use is found among
teenagers (http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/040721/d040721a.htm).
Since it is unclear what, if any, effect cannabis smoke has on a developing
brain beyond the normal psychedelic results, it is a mistake to condemn
outright the use of cannabis among young people. A more constructive way of
reducing recklessness would be open, honest and reality based discussions
within the family household about the potential benefits and the unknown
factors of psychedelic drug use (as discussed in the MAPS Rights of Passage
Project www.maps.org/rightsofpassage/).
The impact
of cannabis on driving ability is likewise mired in mystery and debate. The
Canadian Senate Special Committee on Cannabis has concluded that “cannabis
alone, particularly in low doses, has little effect on the skills involved in
automobile driving” even though it has a generally negative impact on decision
time and trajectory (http://cannabislink.ca/gov/senatesumm.
htm). Another study on cannabis and driving has concluded that the
effect THC has on one’s ability to drive differs little from many other medicinal
drugs. Furthermore, the study found that while alcohol encourages risky
driving, cannabis encourages greater caution. Cannabis users are also better
able to compensate for the adverse effects the drug has on driving ability
(Hindrik, Marijuana use and driving, p.44-48).
Since multiple studies have concluded that the mere presence of cannabis is not
a sufficient factor in reducing the ability to drive, more focus should be
placed on a driver’s coordination, awareness and response time rather than their
blood/THC levels.
Because of the very subjective nature of
the cannabis experience steadfast universal guidelines of any perspective are
doomed to irrelevance. Defining the personal risks and benefits of cannabis use
is best left to the individual. Individuals armed with knowledge of their herb,
themselves and their needs will be better able to build a positive relationship
with cannabis. Ultimately, mass education campaigns such as this (TRIP) will be
vastly more effective in reducing the potential harm of cannabis (or any other
drug) than the failed programs of the abstinence/prohibitionist status quo.
« Safety | Responsible Use | Links » |